Google: We Don't Have A Concept Of Toxic Domains
Google's John Mueller said on Twitter "we don't have a concept of toxic domains." It was in a reply about a third-party SEO tool saying some of the links to his site are low quality and maybe toxic. 谷歌的約翰·穆勒(John Mueller)在推特上說:“我們沒有有毒域名的概念。” 有人在答復第三方SEO工具時說,指向他網站的某些鏈接質量低下,甚至有毒。
Google said previously most site do not have toxic links. So I guess there is some sort of "concept" around a toxic link but I doubt Google classifies those links internally as toxic. 谷歌此前表示,大多數網站沒有有害鏈接。因此,我猜想有毒鏈接周圍存在某種“概念”,但我懷疑Google在內部將這些鏈接歸類為有毒鏈接。
PageRank by definition gives different weights to links based on the reputation of those links. But could those weights be negative? I doubt it, not since Penguin 4.0. 根據定義,PageRank根據這些鏈接的信譽為鏈接賦予不同的權重。但是這些權重是否為負?我對此表示懷疑,自企鵝4.0之后就沒有。
In any event, sure, I think with manual actions, some links can be "toxic" in terms of hurting a site from ranking. But with Penguin 4.0, Google now algorithmically just ignores bad links to your site. 當然,無論如何,我認為通過手動操作,某些鏈接在損害網站排名方面可能是“有毒的”。但是使用Penguin 4.0,Google現在從算法上只會忽略指向您網站的錯誤鏈接。
Here are those tweets:
Forum discussion at Twitter.
文章為作者獨立觀點,不代表DLZ123立場。如有侵權,請聯系我們。( 版權為作者所有,如需轉載,請聯系作者 )

網站運營至今,離不開小伙伴們的支持。 為了給小伙伴們提供一個互相交流的平臺和資源的對接,特地開通了獨立站交流群。
群里有不少運營大神,不時會分享一些運營技巧,更有一些資源收藏愛好者不時分享一些優質的學習資料。
現在可以掃碼進群,備注【加群】。 ( 群完全免費,不廣告不賣課!)